Actually do something instead of complaining

If this New Constitution were ratified, it would have positive impact on you and your children and grandchildren - all generations to come. It is time to stop complaining and to do something that will actually change things for the better. Your input and support is needed!!
Showing posts with label We The People. Show all posts
Showing posts with label We The People. Show all posts

Monday, January 16, 2012

Jefferson says Constitution must change to be viable


On June 12, 1816, Thomas Jefferson wrote a long letter to Samuel Kercheval in response to a letter from Kercheval.

In the letter, Jefferson starts out saying the original Constitution does not form a truly republican form of government because there are too many situations in which the people are not equally represented.  He said the House of Representatives is only elected by half the people, the Senate is not proportionate to population, the President is elected by electors or the House Of Representatives, the President’s cabinet is elected by no one, and the judges of the Supreme Court are not elected by the people.

“Where then is our republicanism to be found? Not in our constitution certainly, but merely in the spirit of our people. That would oblige even a despot to govern us republicanly. Owing to this spirit, and to nothing in the form of our constitution, all things have gone well. But this fact, so triumphantly misquoted by the enemies of reformation, is not the fruit of our constitution, but has prevailed in spite of it. Our functionaries have done well, because generally honest men. If any were not so, they feared to show it.”

“The sum of these amendments is, 1. General Suffrage. 2. Equal representation in the legislature. 3. An executive chosen by the people. 4. Judges elective or amovable. 5. Justices, jurors, and sheriffs elective. 6. Ward divisions. And 7. Periodical amendments of the constitution.”

"Some men look at constitutions with sanctimonious reverence, and deem them like the arc of the covenant, too sacred to be touched. They ascribe to the men of the preceding age a wisdom more than human, and suppose what they did to be beyond amendment. I knew that age well; I belonged to it, and labored with it. It deserved well of its country. It was very like the present, but without the experience of the present; and forty years of experience in government is worth a century of book-reading; and this they would say themselves, were they to rise from the dead. I am certainly not an advocate for frequent and untried changes in laws and constitutions. I think moderate imperfections had better be borne with; because, when once known, we accommodate ourselves to them, and find practical means of correcting their ill effects. But I know also, that laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths disclosed, and manners and opinions change with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also, and keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy, as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors. It is this preposterous idea which has lately deluged Europe in blood….Let us, as our sister States have done, avail ourselves of our reason and experience, to correct the crude essays of our first and unexperienced, although wise, virtuous, and well-meaning councils. And lastly, let us provide in our constitution for its revision at stated periods. What these periods should be, nature herself indicates. By the European tables of mortality, of the adults living at any one moment of time, a majority will be dead in about nineteen years. At the end of that period, then, a new majority is come into place; or, in other words, a new generation. Each generation is as independent as the one preceding, as that was of all which had gone before. It has then, like them, a right to choose for itself the form of government it believes most promotive of its own happiness; consequently, to accommodate to the circumstances in which it finds itself, that received from its predecessors; and it is for the peace and good of mankind, that a solemn opportunity of doing this every nineteen or twenty years, should be provided by the constitution; so that it may be handed on, with periodical repairs, from generation to generation, to the end of time, if anything human can so long endure.”

A rendition of the entire letter may be found at http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/index.asp?document=459

Sunday, December 25, 2011

Provision 8 Ratification And Effect Of This New Constitution


Provision 8 of the New Constitution replaces Article 7 of the original Constitution.  Provision 8 says, “The ratification of this New Constitution is based on a Vote Of The People with two-thirds in the affirmative. This New Constitution goes into full force and effect at the expiration of the prior Constitution.”

The method of transferring from the original Constitution to the New Constitution is via an amendment to the original Constitution.  The amendment to the original Constitution will be issued separately.

Provision 7 Law Of The Land


Provision 7 of the New Constitution is essentially the same Article 6 of the original Constitution except updated and reworded.


Next:  Provision 8 Ratification And Effect Of This New Constitution

Provision 5 National Emergencies

A “National Emergency” is a new concept in the New Constitution.  When a National Emergency is declared by a vote of The People, certain actions are authorized by the national government.  The ability to have a vote of The People in a timely manner is now possible because of electronic communications via radio, television and the internet.  This Provision would require the organization of a capability to hold national elections quickly and safely.

When in a state of National Emergency:
  • Congress does not have to balance the budget
  • Congress may declare war or authorize the use of Military Forces outside the United States

Next:  Provision 6 Amending This New Constitution

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

2.5 Compensation


Currently, Congress sets the compensation for the President.  This puts the compensation in the area of political debate and decisions which can only cause problems.

The New Constitution corrects this problem.  First, in the definition of terms in the Preamble, there is a definition of compensation:

“Compensation” includes current and future monies accrued or paid to a Person by the United States, plus items of value accrued or paid for by the United States including, but not limited to, living expenses, health care and retirement benefits.
 
In the New Constitution, the House of Representatives can recommend a change in compensation for the President and Vice President.   The recommend is given to The People and The People vote “yes” or “no” on the recommendation.  In a binding referendum, the “owners” now approve the compensation of its President and Vice President.

This Section also approves ten days of vacation a year for each for the President and Vice President.

Section 1.7 also requires a binding referendum for approval of compensation for members of Congress.

You may read the New Constitution at www.NewConstitution.info/images/New_Constitution.pdf
                                           
Next:  2.6 Military and Defense

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Provision 2 – President And Vice President

This second branch of government was created by the writers of the original Constitution to carry out and enforce the Laws passed by Congress.  The Executive branch is also intended to be one of the three centers of power within the government.  Having three centers of power helps insure that no one branch can take total control of the nation to form a dictatorship or oligarchy.

The writers of the original Constitution understood the nature of man enough to know that man will almost always try to grab as much power as he can.  Looking at the struggles among our three branches of government over the last 220+ years demonstrates the accuracy of their understanding and the wisdom of their decision to separate the powers.

It can be argued that the three branches of government have, in total, become an oligarchy.  The New Constitution is intended to either prevent that from happening or to dismantle the oligarchy if it does, in fact, exist.  The vast majority of Americans would agree that having an American dictatorship or oligarchy is not in their best interest.  In their quest for power and money, they steal the freedoms of The People which are guaranteed under the original Constitution and Bill Of Rights.

Provision 2 of the New Constitution, like Article 2 of the original Constitution and Amendments, deals with the authority and responsibilities of the President and Vice President.


Next:  2.1 Executive Power

Section 1.20 – Responsibilities of Congress


Taken from Section 8 of the original Constitution, the statement has been segregated to emphasis its importance and it has been clarified.

In addition, this section specifies that “Congress will not assume any powers unless specifically stated in this New Constitution.”  Much has been said over the years that Congress has overreached its authority under the original Constitution – that it has learned how to game the system.  Gaming the Constitution has been true since day one of the original Constitution and will be the same under the New Constitution – that is the nature of man.  This statement is intended to mean what it says, and to hold up a finger saying, “We, The People, are watching you.”


Next:  Provision 2 - President And Vice President